So this is the personal dilemma that I am currently attempting to work through:
Where is the line that demarcates healthy introspection from selfishness?
This is the question that I have been posing to myself for at least 4 or 5 months, and now I pose it to you. I have been trying to solve various aspects of this for a long time. The first time that it occurred to me in any form was in 1 Corinthians class with Jim Snyder. At that point it was something like, "Where is the line between personal freedom in Christ and causing your brother to stumble?" Obviously I still don't have a solution, because I'm still thinking about it.
Why am I thinking about it? I suspect that I may be selfish. One of the reasons that I have been trying to crack this one for so long is that I want to determine what I can do. I suppose I could always appeal to the conscience rule, and I think that the conscience rule can be very helpful. I use it all the time just like you do. But when a person is like me, which is to say that they are really good at pissing people off, they are always looking for new ways to challenge peoples beliefs, to get them to think about what they believe and why.
In Gospels class, Weatherly said several times that the Gospel message is divisive by its very nature. Jesus' teaching specifically causes a state where the hearer, when discovering that he doesn't understand what the hell Jesus is talking about, can either focus outwardly and reject the message and the messenger, or they can focus inwardly and try to figure out why they don't understand. This concept is something that I take very seriously. When I don't understand something, I try to understand why. I try to understand my perspective and if other perspectives are possible. Is it possible to carry this to far? Of course it's possible to take anything to far, but I don't want to be self absorbed about everything. Most of you who know me know that I am very laid back and I am glad that such is the case. But the "trying to understand things" part of me never shuts off, this might be the only thing (excepting the obvious) that doesn't shut off.
Something else that I have come up with (as far as I know) is that I firmly believe that what you believe about other people gives you the necessary perspective for dealing with how you think about yourself. Thus if you can recognize how you typically characterize people etc., this can tell you how you think, which is something about yourself. Without trying to understand how you understand others, I think that it would be increasingly difficult to understand yourself. Language is a system that is very much built on difference. One of the ways that we know the color red is that it isn't blue, yellow, or green. I think the same is true of people, we only know a person by seeing what they are not in addition to what they are.
Do we ever reach a point where there is no bullshit, in any area of our lives? The fact of the matter is that when/if that occurs (rarely) you end up with a new problem. For instance, the closest relationship I ever had with a person outside of my family, was a very close relationship (first serious girlfriend), and when we got to the point where we knew practically everything about each other, small things started to annoy the piss out of me. This is the problem that a lack of bullshit incites. All of the sudden you know too much about a person and there are various ways of dealing with this. I went with the ending the relationship option, and that started a new set of problems.
Thus I think that it would be safe to say that everyone and every point in their life is dealing with some sort of problem. When this problem is solved or at least dealt with, new problems arise and you work on those. The question then, is are my problems worth talking about? Is bullshit the problem or the solution? The fact is I crave all sorts of relationships with different people. There is nothing wrong with this, however, wanting to be able to dictate the terms of all those relationships may be unrealistic/sadistic. Keeping up with the bullshit so that all of these relationships are moving in the direction you want is exhausting, and worthless anyway. But I think we all do it.
This is a main component of what I would define as a selfish person. A person who is always working for their own benefit in every relationship they have. By this definition I would hope that I managed to exclude myself. But why do you hang out with certain people? For me, the answer to that question is that they don't annoy the piss out of me. For you it may be a different answer. Nevertheless we have come right back to where we started. Can a person pursue all types of relationships without being selfish? Can one pursue a betterment of the self, without being selfish?
I need a better definition for selfish. And I think that this may fall under the "get the eff over it!" category. I have said many times to friends that our entire school would benefit a tremendous amount if they just got the eff over it. I think that I am too introspective much of the time, and I think that it makes me selfish. When I read over this post again all I am going to think is "selfish selfish selfish."
I realized the other day that my "luck" is as bad as it can be and still be funny. Is trying to figure out why that is selfish?
*You have just taken a tour of a small section of my brain, what I hope is a healthily but not overly introspective section. Feel free to comment on any part.